Jump to content
Maniac Muslim Forums

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Listening to...

    Nobody can stop us, let the body move on. Curiosity multiplied one million times. So we are the mega, mega, mega! Denji Sentai Megaranger! This actually reminds me of the school days. Namely when I was 14/15.
  3. Today
  4. "Fundamentally you can’t really define it because it cannot be defined. Those people want you to TELL them what to do- remember that’s not your job here. If they don’t like it, that’s tough, because there are boundaries to our role."

  5. Last film you watched?

    Watching Atypical on Netflix.
  6. Transgender at 11

    She writes as though you can only be a feminist if you are a woman and I disagree. I know men who consider themselves to be feminists. This person is South African, not American. But then, in looking at this, how does she know that she needs to be a feminist if she has not experienced fully what it is to be female? Certain things that women are fighting against this person looks forward to as affirmation of her femininity; e.g being catcalled - she says she loves it when it happens, and from her point of view I can understand it, but from a feminist point of view, this is what women are fighting against, to be able to be in a space without being sexualised.
  7. Transgender at 11

    it is. most (conservative) women in USA don't identify themselves as feminist.
  8. Transgender at 11

    This person also seems to equate being a woman with feminism, as though the two are exclusive. And now I've gotten to the part about the toxic masculinity and overbearing father who basically forced the person into a submissive role her entire life and she explicitly says the father likes having submissive women and being in control. I don't know, the more I read about these things, the more I feel that this is really just a mental illness :/
  9. Last film you watched?

    Apocalypto. I really like this movie.
  10. Yesterday
  11. "Helping one person may not change the world. But it could change the world for one person." 

  12. Transgender at 11

    There already is and its a can of worms https://genderneutralpronoun.wordpress.com/tag/ze-and-zir/
  13. Last week
  14. Transgender at 11

    It's nice to see that this discussion has already been started on MM. So, last year I went to a talk given by a transgender woman and it was interesting to say the least. (I can't remember if I've posted about it on here already). This person has also written a book about their experiences and about their transition. Now, obviously, not having gone through this it is difficult for me to understand and sometimes (and perhaps more often than not) the questions asked may be worded in a way is unintentionally harmful. For example, I asked how she knew that she was female and even though she was polite and just said she knew that didn't really answer my question, but then again I did not explain myself too well. As someone who grew up as very much one of the boys and who has always hated wearing dresses and skirts and makeup and basically shunned all things that give off the feminine image, I have never thought that I was or identified as male. I have, for the most part, generally been uncomfortable in my own body but again, nothing pushed me toward to saying I am actually male and neither do I feel that way now. So, it might be the wrong question to ask, but how does a person know that they aren't male if born in a male body. Also, how do they even know that they are female without having experienced what it is to be female? I've only just started the book and I'm hoping that by the end of it I'll have a better understanding about what this whole thing is about Also, why can't non-binary people come up with a new pronoun? They is a plural in my head and it gets a bit annoying to read they for a single person.
  15. I'd rather be real than get paid for being fake.

  16. Thanks- that's helpful info. I'll have to read more about the dot-com bubble. If nothing else, cryptocurrencies have piqued my interested in financed. Obviously you know a lot more about the subject than I do. For the record, I do think a vast majority of cryptos will (and should) fail.
  17. All companies that survived the bubble had immense financial discipline. Amazon is the greatest example of this, and there are in depth financial analyses into the operation which Jeff Bezos ran but the key takeaway is he was one of the few to go 'slow and steady'. Google didn't have its IPO (initial public offering, where shares become available to the public on exchanges) until 2004 which was well after the crash and all investors prior were the same institutional investors who are warning against Bitcoin today. Some companies survived the bubble its true, but let us look at some of those survivors: Yahoo had a price of $108.7 at the peak of the dotcom bubble, when the bubble burst and settled, it had a price of around $5, representing a loss of 95.5% on investment. It never recovered. Amazon was valued at $106.7 at the bubbles peak, but when it settled was valued at around $15, an 86% loss on investment. Today it is valued at $1294.58, which would be an annual return of 15.87% compounded. Comparatively, DJIA has had a 5.24% annual return over the same period. Ebay doubled in share price over the year preceding the bubble, however, rather than losing more than 90% of its value, it simply returned to the price it held previously, with natural growth/loss occurring over time. However those who bought it at the peak lost 50% of their investment. Ebay has had a 8.73% compounded annual return since then until now. Analysing the information, sure what investors bought was not worthless, but it was excessively overvalued and they suffered massive losses. Of the few companies that survived, most declined further or flatlined. Of around 2800 companies that went public during the dot-com bubble and the events preceding it, Amazon and Ebay were the exceptions with the rest all being losing investments. Given then, the enormous amount of risk, it is difficult to say that Amazon or Ebay really paid off on a risk-adjusted basis. Yes, they offered higher returns on the market, but the failure rate of the industry they were in was incredibly high. Now lets add another fact to the mix: listed companies are very transparent, with annual reporting every year revealing their cash flows and growth, from which analysts can deduce valuations. Cryptocurrencies on the other hand don't have cashflows (unless it is a proof of stake model like Ethereum where validators use their 'stake' to validate a transaction and charge a fee). This means their value is tied to being a modicum of exchange (in the case of proof of work like Bitcoin or Dogecoin) or network facilitator (like in the case of Ripple). The first can be estimated based on the volume of transactions on the ledger, but the second is quite opaque because the valuation of the network facilitation capacity of the Ripple network isn't in the public domain. This means that from a financial standpoint at the very least, cryptocurrencies could be considered even more risky than tech companies in the dot-com era boom. Right now there are 1469 cryptocurrencies with a market cap of $630bn. How many do you think will survive, given the survival rate of the dot-com bubble, and on a risk adjusted basis, are any of them even worth it? That is ultimately for you to gauge. Of course I have the benefit of hindsight, but many notable investors (Warren Buffet of course comes to mind) refused to buy into the craze. From an Islamic perspective I would argue the situation of investing in the tech bubble would've garnered different answers from different scholars at the time, but if we are trying to objectively measure gharar then crypto definitely presents a larger risk than the dot-com bubble did and the fact it is even less transparent, and even more so that unlike the dot-com bubble, most market analysts actually view crypto as a bubble. I would probably say yeah, it would've been haram to invest in the dot-com bubble based on my perception of what constitutes extreme gharar. Ultimately what it comes down to is what your expectations are of the situation because every single investor has their own preferences and perception of risk. The fatwa was a generalised one (given the consensus of most finance professionals on the matter), but if you don't view crypto as having extreme gharar based on your own conclusions, nobody can really force you to adopt another conclusion. The general person isn't a finance professional or tech expert and for them investing in crypto ultimately has to by definition pose extreme gharar. tl;dr: The fatwa was a general one Crypto bubble is more risky than the dot-com bubble for investors (thus more gharar) It is difficult to answer things in hindsight Gharar itself is a subjective matter (just like risk)
  18. Not really. We've already established an investment, even a speculative one, is not gambling, right? With Amazon or Google, you'd have to actually look at the company, see what they have to offer, and decide whether it seems like it will be valuable. The same is true of cryptos -- a lot of them are totally worthless, but some of them actually seem to provide useful services and possibilities.
  19. Cryptocurrencies: THE FUTURE IS HERE

    Isn't this like asking weather or not it's halal to buy a winning lottery ticket?
  20. Chinese babies though...so cute. :wub:

  21. That's fair. But if you are comparing cryptos to the dotcom bubble (a comparison which I don't disagree with), would it have been haram to invest in Amazon or Google in '99?
  22. 1. The thing is, it is behaving exactly as a bubble does. There is a broad consensus on this amongst financial professionals. It highly resembles Dotcom bubble of the 90s albeit at a far more limited scope (for now). 2. Bridgewater is a hedge fund. They aim to invest in high risk strategies to get a return and they don't advise others. They use numerous strategies but their hallmark strategies are all quant strategies, which means they really don't care for the underlying asset type but are focused on maximising returns independent of market risk. Cryptocurrencies are very much the type of product they would use in building their portfolio (using both long and short positions). Most hedge funds using quant strategies like Bridgewater's typically invest in bubbles because they can use these products to adjust the risk of their portfolio with less capital than traditional investments require. 3. It isn't that it is only ok if global corporations say the product is fine, it is the fact that amongst finance experts the broad consensus is that Bitcoin is a bubble, and that bubbles are genuinely accepted as being markets of extreme gharar.
  23. Anyway, in terms of my own feelings re: investing now, after getting lots of opinions, I'll probably wait until more scholars have more to say. It seems a very fresh topic and the scholarship is not fully up to speed. I have seen opinions supportive, and, at least from Mo's source, opinions opposed. But I feel very unconvinced. My main concern is that, if tomorrow a currency were to BOOM, it wouldn't feel like honest money to me. I'm not sure that any investment would, though. That said, I did put a very small amount into Ripple when it hit its *probable* rock bottom. I feel pretty confident that Ripple is in a league of its own. It's more out of personal interest in seeing how it all works.
  24. I think this is Mo's point though, not his. He didn't say anything about uncertainty or a bubble. Your right that his final fatwa is pending; he is unsympathetic to the first opinion. But I guess we'll see what he ultimately says--if he publishes more.
  25. I think you misunderstood him. Using bit coin as currency is okay according to some scholars, but final fatwa is pending. Investing in bitcoin (buy now and sell later) involves lot of uncertainty and hence extreme gharar. Otherwise it is like investing in currency, but with the uncertainty/bubble factor. I am not too sure about investing in traditional currency my self.
  26. To Mo, because I feel like I'm being pulled into an argument I wasn't going for at this point: -What I noted in the beginning (and which everyone knows) is that the future of cryptocurrency is uncertain. Even if cryptos take off--or if blockchain does--that means nothing of the future, for example, of Bitcoin, which is simply the first--not the most efficient. So yeah, it's based on a lot of excitement; the thing is, the value has flailed a lot in the last few months, but it will ultimately correct itself. I think that reflects that there is a lot of *real* money in there and people are going to let it sit. Right now a lot of it is driven by people fearing they will miss out--that's the nature of it being new, now mainstream, and quite easy to buy-in. But we don't know it's future. You might *think* it's a bubble. You don't know it's a bubble. -Well, I definitely do not think that a firm like Bridgewater is going to be investing their clients or advising others to invest in Bitcoin. There's no doubt it's a risky investment, which I've noted from the very beginning. (though, their clients would not have been complaining had they had the foresight to invest a few years ago, would they?) However--and this is based on subjective experience--there are 'tons' of young people working at companies like Bridgewater who are personally investing in Bitcoin. This I know from friends who work at similar firms in New York. While I don't know much about finance, since I've become intrigued, I have you on your anti-crypto crusade, but I do also have them whispering in my ear too. They're obviously not putting all their money in cryptos; but they are diversifying within the crypto world and betting on it to work out. -But none of this really addresses the issues I have. I have no delusions about whether cryptos are a *safe* investment. But where's the hadith that says it's only OK to invest if global investment corporations A-Okay it? Oh, but he himself doesn't seem to make that point at all. Just the opposite, he says: "The fact that people are using them as investments does not negate their currency feature. It just gives them similarity to investing in foreign currencies." I figured this implies Bitcoin is like a currency --> you can invest in a currency --> therefore that people use it as an investment is not problematic, right? Or did I misunderstand it? And this is the point. I don't think there's much a consensus on Bitcoin/cryptos.
  27. Good Islamic books

    It is mandatory on every adult male and female Muslim to gain knowledge. In the past people used to go in the Islamic library for the sake of knowledge in a peaceful environment. Therefore he should read good Islamic books from an Islamic library so that he will get to know about the teachings of Sharia.
  28. Islamic Books Library

    Islamic Books Library has many unique features. Users can also make any book as his favorite which will make it even easier to find that particular book. After marking any book as favorite that particular book will show in the favorite section. Use this wonderful service and persuade others for making most of it.
  1. Load more activity
×